Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 15:11:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA0B1A7A6184D48E4DDB1D89312D51B580FCBB898FFDF1262A4BA8C63AE1BFC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. At this stage “the Court is not required to ascertain whether any violations (..) under the Genocide Convention occurred” (para 30). Rather it only ruled that “some of the rights claimed by South Africa” are “plausible” (para 54). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751251437751836800
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA0B1A7A6184D48E4DDB1D89312D51B580FCBB898FFDF1262A4BA8C63AE1BFC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1706368278720
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751251437751836800CA0B1A7A6184D48E4DDB1D89312D51B580FCBB898FFDF1262A4BA8C63AE1BFC2