Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-01-27 14:30:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is false. At this stage “the Court is not required to ascertain whether any violations (..) under the Genocide Convention occurred” (para 30). Rather it only ruled that “some of the rights claimed by South Africa” are “plausible” (para 54). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

Written by BB53A9139C19DCA6551F98DF2A91A6E6BDC399D776C390D227DC58FD906703F1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1750978599417479582

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1751251437751836800
  • noteId - 1751251437751836800
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BB53A9139C19DCA6551F98DF2A91A6E6BDC399D776C390D227DC58FD906703F1 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1706365854093
  • tweetId - 1750978599417479582
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is false. At this stage “the Court is not required to ascertain whether any violations (..) under the Genocide Convention occurred” (para 30). Rather it only ruled that “some of the rights claimed by South Africa” are “plausible” (para 54). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-01-27 14:30:54 UTC
(1706365854093)
2024-01-27 16:08:07 UTC
(1706371687379)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-28 02:22:43 UTC
(1706408563402)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-27 16:08:07 UTC
(1706371687379)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-01-27 18:05:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 17:38:30 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 17:10:26 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 14:51:25 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 13:00:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 11:37:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 10:10:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 10:08:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 10:05:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 09:43:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 09:28:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 09:27:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 09:11:18 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 09:07:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 09:05:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 09:01:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 08:55:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 08:54:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 08:39:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 08:39:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 08:33:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 00:58:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 20:49:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-01 10:24:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-01 10:18:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-01 10:25:01 -0600 Rating Details