Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 21:11:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6058355AE440697795598DC9F1978947AF658DE7CE90F73869DB99427239F7E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wikipedia admits that their website isn’t a valid source for citation, and they explain why at this link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source The OP video is claimed to be a documentary. A counter-point CN may be helpful, but sources must be credible. NNN until a better CN is written.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746596099601649914
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6058355AE440697795598DC9F1978947AF658DE7CE90F73869DB99427239F7E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1705266701392
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17465960996016499146058355AE440697795598DC9F1978947AF658DE7CE90F73869DB99427239F7E0