Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-01-14 18:12:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Wikipedia admits that their website isn’t a valid source for citation, and they explain why at this link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source The OP video is claimed to be a documentary. A counter-point CN may be helpful, but sources must be credible. NNN until a better CN is written.

Written by 6057A073B115D0989E61A51D9A8BEE8C3A66AADC4FF6B483750ED529B16D935E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1746450494883504612

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1746596099601649914
  • noteId - 1746596099601649914
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6057A073B115D0989E61A51D9A8BEE8C3A66AADC4FF6B483750ED529B16D935E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1705255934988
  • tweetId - 1746450494883504612
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Wikipedia admits that their website isn’t a valid source for citation, and they explain why at this link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source The OP video is claimed to be a documentary. A counter-point CN may be helpful, but sources must be credible. NNN until a better CN is written.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-01-14 18:12:14 UTC
(1705255934988)
2024-01-14 22:17:56 UTC
(1705270676737)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-01-16 02:06:06 UTC
(1705370766943)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2024-01-14 22:17:56 UTC
(1705270676737)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-01-15 02:44:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 15:11:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 15:03:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 12:54:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 12:35:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 12:26:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 12:16:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-16 17:56:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-16 17:21:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 15:44:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 13:55:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 13:45:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 13:37:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 12:51:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-14 12:13:01 -0600 Rating Details