Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-23 17:50:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D42FD3D9002FCD1C687E4E4E82455E3099D91E912BC632FF7C1B27436E0A5C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

In Matal v. Tam, the US Supreme Court upheld there is no "hate speech" limitation to the 1A: "The idea that the government may restrict speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1293_1o13.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1738617231389479255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D42FD3D9002FCD1C687E4E4E82455E3099D91E912BC632FF7C1B27436E0A5C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1703353805596
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17386172313894792557D42FD3D9002FCD1C687E4E4E82455E3099D91E912BC632FF7C1B27436E0A5C0