Birdwatch Note
2023-12-23 17:47:04 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
In Matal v. Tam, the US Supreme Court upheld there is no "hate speech" limitation to the 1A: "The idea that the government may restrict speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1293_1o13.pdf
Written by CC430CC6095BF9892CB0CB58775672FD31BD956A3674DCF315B0F443228AA8F9
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1738578961544753427
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1738617231389479255
- noteId - 1738617231389479255
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - CC430CC6095BF9892CB0CB58775672FD31BD956A3674DCF315B0F443228AA8F9 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1703353624564
- tweetId - 1738578961544753427
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- In Matal v. Tam, the US Supreme Court upheld there is no "hate speech" limitation to the 1A: "The idea that the government may restrict speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the First Amendment." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1293_1o13.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-23 17:47:04 UTC (1703353624564) |
2023-12-23 19:21:18 UTC (1703359278700) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-24 02:00:17 UTC (1703383217195) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-23 19:21:18 UTC (1703359278700) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-23 13:12:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 13:09:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 13:08:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:58:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:49:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:45:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:44:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:44:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:39:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:29:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:29:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:27:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:24:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:22:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:18:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:02:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 12:01:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 11:59:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 11:59:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 11:58:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 11:52:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 11:51:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 11:50:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-23 11:48:36 -0600 | Rating Details |