Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-08 16:47:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BDB8DD34177322E970FEEEF6C5A430627417DC1D571A11BDF3F0EC389AE6A7D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The optimal way to pack 21 squares inside a larger square is currently unknown. Optimal solutions have been proven for numbers of squares from 1-10, 14-16, 22-25, 33-36, 62-64, 79-81, 98-100, and any square integer. https://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/DS7 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packing_problems

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1733051937434845264
participantId -
raterParticipantId - BDB8DD34177322E970FEEEF6C5A430627417DC1D571A11BDF3F0EC389AE6A7D1
createdAtMillis - 1702054061963
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1733051937434845264BDB8DD34177322E970FEEEF6C5A430627417DC1D571A11BDF3F0EC389AE6A7D1