Birdwatch Note
2023-12-08 09:12:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The optimal way to pack 21 squares inside a larger square is currently unknown. Optimal solutions have been proven for numbers of squares from 1-10, 14-16, 22-25, 33-36, 62-64, 79-81, 98-100, and any square integer. https://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/DS7 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packing_problems
Written by 8C28C852BE5288D7165FF740AA0A65C9E5D8311BA85450E8863DBABB3CD91AF7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732945379514105952
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1733051937434845264
- noteId - 1733051937434845264
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8C28C852BE5288D7165FF740AA0A65C9E5D8311BA85450E8863DBABB3CD91AF7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702026755088
- tweetId - 1732945379514105952
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The optimal way to pack 21 squares inside a larger square is currently unknown. Optimal solutions have been proven for numbers of squares from 1-10, 14-16, 22-25, 33-36, 62-64, 79-81, 98-100, and any square integer. https://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/DS7 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packing_problems
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-08 09:12:35 UTC (1702026755088) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-09 03:24:29 UTC (1702092269635) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-08 17:37:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 17:35:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 17:15:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 16:02:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 14:55:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 14:35:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 13:55:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 13:54:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 13:49:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 13:17:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 12:52:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 12:36:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 12:12:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 12:03:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 10:58:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 10:47:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 07:54:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 07:54:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 07:33:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 07:21:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 06:35:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 06:21:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 06:13:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 06:09:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 05:20:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 05:15:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 04:08:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 19:44:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-08 18:40:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-26 04:25:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-15 10:48:29 -0500 | Rating Details |