Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-08 23:35:22 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 56C8F80A43006E3E22026FBD79EB92826835B4B11F1E512876D958525A90F528
Participant Details

Original Note:

The optimal way to pack 21 squares inside a larger square is currently unknown. Optimal solutions have been proven for numbers of squares from 1-10, 14-16, 22-25, 33-36, 62-64, 79-81, 98-100, and any square integer. https://www.combinatorics.org/ojs/index.php/eljc/article/view/DS7 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packing_problems

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1733051937434845264
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 56C8F80A43006E3E22026FBD79EB92826835B4B11F1E512876D958525A90F528
createdAtMillis - 1702078522946
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 173305193743484526456C8F80A43006E3E22026FBD79EB92826835B4B11F1E512876D958525A90F528