Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 17:25:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F43DC791BFA6A4C0E46FE88E621FCFA41214BB20B1B7036C9C1447A014D390E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN proposed note says pro-hamas wasn't mentioned in the article. The post did not say pro-hamas, it said pro-palestine. Restrictions placed on pro-palestine protests is mentioned in the second paragraph: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/deutschland-civicus-bewertet-freiheitsrechte-als-eingeengt-a-1cdf20e5-8c03-4d83-ad74-a71212d2bc2e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732789877203239255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F43DC791BFA6A4C0E46FE88E621FCFA41214BB20B1B7036C9C1447A014D390E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1701969903697
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1732789877203239255F43DC791BFA6A4C0E46FE88E621FCFA41214BB20B1B7036C9C1447A014D390E4