Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-07 15:51:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN proposed note says pro-hamas wasn't mentioned in the article. The post did not say pro-hamas, it said pro-palestine. Restrictions placed on pro-palestine protests is mentioned in the second paragraph: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/deutschland-civicus-bewertet-freiheitsrechte-als-eingeengt-a-1cdf20e5-8c03-4d83-ad74-a71212d2bc2e

Written by 50C53CF8A384EBBBE9B6EC67E5FC11B8F448D9FDB21B82DCE6012B6472C00F41
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732683129633071177

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1732789877203239255
  • noteId - 1732789877203239255
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 50C53CF8A384EBBBE9B6EC67E5FC11B8F448D9FDB21B82DCE6012B6472C00F41 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1701964275059
  • tweetId - 1732683129633071177
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN proposed note says pro-hamas wasn't mentioned in the article. The post did not say pro-hamas, it said pro-palestine. Restrictions placed on pro-palestine protests is mentioned in the second paragraph: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/deutschland-civicus-bewertet-freiheitsrechte-als-eingeengt-a-1cdf20e5-8c03-4d83-ad74-a71212d2bc2e

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-07 15:51:15 UTC
(1701964275059)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-12-08 03:04:43 UTC
(1702004683234)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-07 16:47:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 14:19:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 12:47:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 12:28:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 12:10:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 12:09:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:46:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:32:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:25:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:15:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:13:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:04:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 11:00:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:35:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:26:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:23:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:15:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:15:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 10:04:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 09:58:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 09:55:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 15:14:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-08 05:03:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 19:34:20 -0600 Rating Details