Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 16:26:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11D8558459393B38F1B95490800271F61EA3FC9152C4BEB7BB4A1566A11E794B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN proposed note says pro-hamas wasn't mentioned in the article. The post did not say pro-hamas, it said pro-palestine. Restrictions placed on pro-palestine protests is mentioned in the second paragraph: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/deutschland-civicus-bewertet-freiheitsrechte-als-eingeengt-a-1cdf20e5-8c03-4d83-ad74-a71212d2bc2e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732789877203239255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11D8558459393B38F1B95490800271F61EA3FC9152C4BEB7BB4A1566A11E794B
  • createdAtMillis - 1701966381030
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173278987720323925511D8558459393B38F1B95490800271F61EA3FC9152C4BEB7BB4A1566A11E794B