Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 03:06:09 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C7D338C64F73DA211CC573CA01351B0ADCF88E47D5F2D17BEED737D87ED9160
Participant Details

Original Note:

Using sources that are dependent on a bias of Climate change being true are not good sources. Sources are extremely misleading as they cite a percentage of change to a degree so small and use a scare tactic like a 100% increase. Well if they increase was .01.. its citing nothing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732539726002040932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9C7D338C64F73DA211CC573CA01351B0ADCF88E47D5F2D17BEED737D87ED9160
  • createdAtMillis - 1701918369699
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17325397260020409329C7D338C64F73DA211CC573CA01351B0ADCF88E47D5F2D17BEED737D87ED9160