Birdwatch Note
2023-12-06 23:17:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Using sources that are dependent on a bias of Climate change being true are not good sources. Sources are extremely misleading as they cite a percentage of change to a degree so small and use a scare tactic like a 100% increase. Well if they increase was .01.. its citing nothing
Written by 155AF6CBAD4D56C443BAF4C193E42646D90BB158E4BC05DA531FE0FB142A06B6
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1732522008225747252
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1732539726002040932
- noteId - 1732539726002040932
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 155AF6CBAD4D56C443BAF4C193E42646D90BB158E4BC05DA531FE0FB142A06B6 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701904634369
- tweetId - 1732522008225747252
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Using sources that are dependent on a bias of Climate change being true are not good sources. Sources are extremely misleading as they cite a percentage of change to a degree so small and use a scare tactic like a 100% increase. Well if they increase was .01.. its citing nothing
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-06 23:17:14 UTC (1701904634369) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-07 04:50:02 UTC (1701924602413) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-06 19:31:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 19:31:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 18:43:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 18:28:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 17:32:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 16:43:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 16:16:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 11:17:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-07 10:45:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 22:23:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 21:06:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 20:27:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 20:20:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 20:20:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 20:09:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 20:08:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 20:07:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 20:02:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-06 20:00:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-09 09:13:15 -0600 | Rating Details |