Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 01:31:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4083BFF72D6F9FC34CDE38C8A798DBB3883A8EFD7EA1F2FB3309515B8062ECED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Using sources that are dependent on a bias of Climate change being true are not good sources. Sources are extremely misleading as they cite a percentage of change to a degree so small and use a scare tactic like a 100% increase. Well if they increase was .01.. its citing nothing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1732539726002040932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4083BFF72D6F9FC34CDE38C8A798DBB3883A8EFD7EA1F2FB3309515B8062ECED
  • createdAtMillis - 1701912697194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17325397260020409324083BFF72D6F9FC34CDE38C8A798DBB3883A8EFD7EA1F2FB3309515B8062ECED