Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-04 21:38:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8EB3204179F1FBD75A1B9955928359BC219531ED03B1A836C5CCCDE4FD5D196
Participant Details

Original Note:

De peilingen van Maurice de Hond zijn wetenschappelijk onbetrouwbaar, allereerst omdat anonieme internetgebruikers ze invullen, zonder toepassing van willekeurige selectie cq randomization. Bovendien ontbreekt een foutmarge, waardoor verschuivingen groter lijken dan ze zijn. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2009/03/03/de-peiling-van-maurice-de-hond-deugt-niet-11691819-a156787

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1731691065575436510
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C8EB3204179F1FBD75A1B9955928359BC219531ED03B1A836C5CCCDE4FD5D196
createdAtMillis - 1701725895214
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1731691065575436510C8EB3204179F1FBD75A1B9955928359BC219531ED03B1A836C5CCCDE4FD5D196