Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-30 02:42:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FC175A483BE027C3610CDAAF169A5E5E765B73FCDAF1CB304DA1162FC2F05D43
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If your suggested note is as speculative as the tweet in question, then there's no point in having a community note. Documents from the P.A authorities in this context are not viewed as a source with enough reliability/impartiality to confirm the claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730029377382199337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FC175A483BE027C3610CDAAF169A5E5E765B73FCDAF1CB304DA1162FC2F05D43
  • createdAtMillis - 1701312138634
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1730029377382199337FC175A483BE027C3610CDAAF169A5E5E765B73FCDAF1CB304DA1162FC2F05D43