Birdwatch Note
2023-11-30 01:02:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. If your suggested note is as speculative as the tweet in question, then there's no point in having a community note. Documents from the P.A authorities in this context are not viewed as a source with enough reliability/impartiality to confirm the claim.
Written by BB297E102848ADC21EDBD45575B54C348235A4A1B34E3B49A51432C038ABE646
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1729763608219775305
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1730029377382199337
- noteId - 1730029377382199337
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BB297E102848ADC21EDBD45575B54C348235A4A1B34E3B49A51432C038ABE646 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1701306120617
- tweetId - 1729763608219775305
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. If your suggested note is as speculative as the tweet in question, then there's no point in having a community note. Documents from the P.A authorities in this context are not viewed as a source with enough reliability/impartiality to confirm the claim.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-30 01:02:00 UTC (1701306120617) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-01 03:12:04 UTC (1701400324779) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-30 18:14:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 14:34:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 07:38:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 06:30:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 06:19:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 01:34:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 00:30:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 21:23:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 21:06:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-01 08:41:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 13:29:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 07:12:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 05:49:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 03:54:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 23:53:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 23:10:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 22:56:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 22:11:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 22:02:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 21:25:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 20:42:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 20:00:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 19:53:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 19:25:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-03 07:36:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-04 04:31:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-03 05:18:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-03 03:48:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-03 12:05:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-01 04:15:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-30 05:04:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 21:32:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 21:28:19 -0600 | Rating Details |