Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-10 03:01:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84024B865A9BAD545760A369604E8AAC42CE1674DB85370C5020445CC6892CB7
Participant Details

Original Note:

A alegação que a vacina é defeituosa foi feita pela defesa no caso. O post faz parecer que o caso já foi julgado e que a vacina teria sido considerada defeituosa pela corte. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/astrazeneca-in-uk-high-court-battle-as-case-labels-covid19-vaccine-defective/news-story/e11c3d8e1b5c6201fcb84f8929d68a04

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722716158640422979
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84024B865A9BAD545760A369604E8AAC42CE1674DB85370C5020445CC6892CB7
  • createdAtMillis - 1699585271896
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172271615864042297984024B865A9BAD545760A369604E8AAC42CE1674DB85370C5020445CC6892CB7