Birdwatch Note
2023-11-09 20:41:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
A alegação que a vacina é defeituosa foi feita pela defesa no caso. O post faz parecer que o caso já foi julgado e que a vacina teria sido considerada defeituosa pela corte. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/astrazeneca-in-uk-high-court-battle-as-case-labels-covid19-vaccine-defective/news-story/e11c3d8e1b5c6201fcb84f8929d68a04
Written by 8BC33423BC62AD63C2EF1E54FE0B357DE14A0CBEB700499440A88407AB697488
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1722702298067911026
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1722716158640422979
- noteId - 1722716158640422979
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8BC33423BC62AD63C2EF1E54FE0B357DE14A0CBEB700499440A88407AB697488 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699562513401
- tweetId - 1722702298067911026
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- A alegação que a vacina é defeituosa foi feita pela defesa no caso. O post faz parecer que o caso já foi julgado e que a vacina teria sido considerada defeituosa pela corte. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/astrazeneca-in-uk-high-court-battle-as-case-labels-covid19-vaccine-defective/news-story/e11c3d8e1b5c6201fcb84f8929d68a04
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-09 20:41:53 UTC (1699562513401) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-10 02:56:01 UTC (1699584961849) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-09 18:28:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 17:22:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 17:09:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 16:34:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 15:48:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 15:12:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 14:58:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 14:58:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-10 00:41:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 23:58:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 21:01:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 20:20:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 19:54:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 19:50:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 19:39:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-09 19:29:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-11 11:24:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-11 19:33:25 -0600 | Rating Details |