Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-09 12:24:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 612C1BAA72AD9ED229ADF412443732CB04DE8EFB22B50DABE718956519A2D9B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post fails to mention that these claims are made by one party in legal action and have not been proven nor supported. Source: The article itself, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/08/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-jab-defective-claims-legal-case/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722570834185728234
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 612C1BAA72AD9ED229ADF412443732CB04DE8EFB22B50DABE718956519A2D9B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1699532699074
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1722570834185728234612C1BAA72AD9ED229ADF412443732CB04DE8EFB22B50DABE718956519A2D9B3