Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-09 11:04:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This post fails to mention that these claims are made by one party in legal action and have not been proven nor supported. Source: The article itself, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/08/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-jab-defective-claims-legal-case/

Written by 5CA6FE52299884F90F662F480783A685036A0CFAE76FE79FCE51E04440490BB5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1722400451939704945

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1722570834185728234
  • noteId - 1722570834185728234
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5CA6FE52299884F90F662F480783A685036A0CFAE76FE79FCE51E04440490BB5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699527865345
  • tweetId - 1722400451939704945
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This post fails to mention that these claims are made by one party in legal action and have not been proven nor supported. Source: The article itself, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/08/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-jab-defective-claims-legal-case/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-09 11:04:25 UTC
(1699527865345)
2023-11-09 17:47:36 UTC
(1699552056815)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-11-10 02:56:01 UTC
(1699584961849)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2023-11-09 17:47:36 UTC
(1699552056815)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-09 16:58:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 16:02:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 14:19:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 14:10:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 13:24:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 13:06:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 12:39:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 12:36:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 12:24:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 12:21:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 12:08:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 09:31:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 08:18:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 07:51:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 07:34:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 07:07:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 06:40:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 06:34:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 06:33:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 06:24:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 06:13:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 06:11:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 06:02:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:58:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:48:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:43:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:40:05 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:32:56 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:29:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:14:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:12:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-09 05:12:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-10 17:48:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-10 15:38:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-10 00:22:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-10 18:42:57 -0600 Rating Details