Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-09 11:29:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C566E2191FFCC83B9C5419CEB4A9B61B62BD9B324D574EA7EDECEA8F84F0F18
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post fails to mention that these claims are made by one party in legal action and have not been proven nor supported. Source: The article itself, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/08/oxford-astrazeneca-covid-jab-defective-claims-legal-case/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722570834185728234
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C566E2191FFCC83B9C5419CEB4A9B61B62BD9B324D574EA7EDECEA8F84F0F18
  • createdAtMillis - 1699529371125
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17225708341857282345C566E2191FFCC83B9C5419CEB4A9B61B62BD9B324D574EA7EDECEA8F84F0F18