Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-07 16:44:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6477488E2CE65573C37717FF6D93CA7846547061876AB2376082554C680DBA7
Participant Details

Original Note:

El comunicado ha sido impulsado por una parte del CGPJ (conservadora) en la actualidad mayoritaria debido a un bloqueo en su renovación desde hace 5 años, forzando al órgano de los jueces a emitir un comunicado sin base jurídica y que repite los argumentos del Partido Popular. https://www.hayderecho.com/2022/09/28/sobre-la-no-renovacion-del-cgpj/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1721647993948934544
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6477488E2CE65573C37717FF6D93CA7846547061876AB2376082554C680DBA7
  • createdAtMillis - 1699375477635
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1721647993948934544C6477488E2CE65573C37717FF6D93CA7846547061876AB2376082554C680DBA7