Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-06 21:57:23 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

El comunicado ha sido impulsado por una parte del CGPJ (conservadora) en la actualidad mayoritaria debido a un bloqueo en su renovación desde hace 5 años, forzando al órgano de los jueces a emitir un comunicado sin base jurídica y que repite los argumentos del Partido Popular. https://www.hayderecho.com/2022/09/28/sobre-la-no-renovacion-del-cgpj/

Written by 0C5533BFD3F5225697005EAB1C3AC347230269719FCF99F3826802588E124423
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721627076183183833

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1721647993948934544
  • noteId - 1721647993948934544
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0C5533BFD3F5225697005EAB1C3AC347230269719FCF99F3826802588E124423 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699307843088
  • tweetId - 1721627076183183833
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • El comunicado ha sido impulsado por una parte del CGPJ (conservadora) en la actualidad mayoritaria debido a un bloqueo en su renovación desde hace 5 años, forzando al órgano de los jueces a emitir un comunicado sin base jurídica y que repite los argumentos del Partido Popular. https://www.hayderecho.com/2022/09/28/sobre-la-no-renovacion-del-cgpj/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-06 21:57:23 UTC
(1699307843088)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-07 03:05:44 UTC
(1699326344811)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-06 17:43:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 17:12:40 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 17:07:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:38:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:30:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:14:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:13:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:11:52 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:11:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:01:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:01:18 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 15:59:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:50:22 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 13:18:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 10:44:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 07:30:03 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 05:18:10 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 01:47:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 23:52:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 23:46:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 23:37:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:53:12 -0600 Rating Details