Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-03 16:48:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED717AF9A46B858EAAD532EE85AA7760AFD2EA98D82D05B2840F46523F8D9003
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Twitter post misrepresents the Nutri-Score. The Nutri-Score rates foods only within their category using A-E scale. So Nesquik's A rating just shows it's better than other kids' cereals, not that it's deemed highly healthy overall. https://gouvernement.lu/en/dossiers.gouv_mpc%2Ben%2Bdossiers%2B2023%2Bnutriscore.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720433076700872738
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED717AF9A46B858EAAD532EE85AA7760AFD2EA98D82D05B2840F46523F8D9003
  • createdAtMillis - 1699030137117
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1720433076700872738ED717AF9A46B858EAAD532EE85AA7760AFD2EA98D82D05B2840F46523F8D9003