Birdwatch Note
2023-11-03 13:29:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Twitter post misrepresents the Nutri-Score. The Nutri-Score rates foods only within their category using A-E scale. So Nesquik's A rating just shows it's better than other kids' cereals, not that it's deemed highly healthy overall. https://gouvernement.lu/en/dossiers.gouv_mpc%2Ben%2Bdossiers%2B2023%2Bnutriscore.html
Written by E095A625BD97FA2425C5E64C5A672E9E58A295F771E6DF5D570530170846611E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719839379533775184
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1720433076700872738
- noteId - 1720433076700872738
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E095A625BD97FA2425C5E64C5A672E9E58A295F771E6DF5D570530170846611E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699018184245
- tweetId - 1719839379533775184
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Twitter post misrepresents the Nutri-Score. The Nutri-Score rates foods only within their category using A-E scale. So Nesquik's A rating just shows it's better than other kids' cereals, not that it's deemed highly healthy overall. https://gouvernement.lu/en/dossiers.gouv_mpc%2Ben%2Bdossiers%2B2023%2Bnutriscore.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-03 13:29:44 UTC (1699018184245) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-04 03:04:16 UTC (1699067056450) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-03 14:41:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 11:48:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 09:22:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 09:15:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 09:02:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 12:19:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 06:20:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 05:41:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 19:40:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-28 06:22:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-13 10:10:14 -0500 | Rating Details |