Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-12 02:32:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3634B6CAD9D6AD507F4F34964F815C886C8C1392E4DAFCDEF101BA76845A6B37
Participant Details

Original Note:

This was a civil action that contested the election; it was not a criminal trial. Yet, in the findings of fact, #s 41 & 48 state two people involved exercised their right against self incrimination & one of them is under investigation by her employer (#43), which is the city. https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720169467139825809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3634B6CAD9D6AD507F4F34964F815C886C8C1392E4DAFCDEF101BA76845A6B37
  • createdAtMillis - 1718159527563
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17201694671398258093634B6CAD9D6AD507F4F34964F815C886C8C1392E4DAFCDEF101BA76845A6B37