Birdwatch Note
2023-11-02 20:02:14 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This was a civil action that contested the election; it was not a criminal trial. Yet, in the findings of fact, #s 41 & 48 state two people involved exercised their right against self incrimination & one of them is under investigation by her employer (#43), which is the city. https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518
Written by 6057A073B115D0989E61A51D9A8BEE8C3A66AADC4FF6B483750ED529B16D935E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719857400306348078
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1720169467139825809
- noteId - 1720169467139825809
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6057A073B115D0989E61A51D9A8BEE8C3A66AADC4FF6B483750ED529B16D935E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698955334836
- tweetId - 1719857400306348078
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This was a civil action that contested the election; it was not a criminal trial. Yet, in the findings of fact, #s 41 & 48 state two people involved exercised their right against self incrimination & one of them is under investigation by her employer (#43), which is the city. https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=26199518
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-02 20:02:14 UTC (1698955334836) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-04 03:04:16 UTC (1699067056450) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-03 16:44:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 12:11:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 12:10:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 11:56:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 10:35:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 10:13:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 10:08:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 06:18:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-03 05:43:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 21:42:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 19:51:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 19:19:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 18:03:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 17:26:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 17:03:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 16:09:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 16:08:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-02 15:14:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-11 21:32:07 -0500 | Rating Details |