Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-01 18:26:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8C55411AF88D74D87D6D05BAF65699FE45F1CBB5389B17307B1FC93DFC289E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Reuters article states that the Swiss Med Board does not need to approve the device as it is not a medical product. The co. making the product claims its internal legal review found the product is legal. The tweet appears to state "approval" b/c of this review. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-switzerland-pod-idUSL1N2SY1YR

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719770047986712955
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8C55411AF88D74D87D6D05BAF65699FE45F1CBB5389B17307B1FC93DFC289E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1698863204212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1719770047986712955A8C55411AF88D74D87D6D05BAF65699FE45F1CBB5389B17307B1FC93DFC289E0