Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-01 17:35:05 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The Reuters article states that the Swiss Med Board does not need to approve the device as it is not a medical product. The co. making the product claims its internal legal review found the product is legal. The tweet appears to state "approval" b/c of this review. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-switzerland-pod-idUSL1N2SY1YR

Written by 8C3AEE06B521CE6AD947744B56AFF2BD68D6DC9A2E0BF0C599B5E069EA1CADD5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719332283683864618

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1719770047986712955
  • noteId - 1719770047986712955
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8C3AEE06B521CE6AD947744B56AFF2BD68D6DC9A2E0BF0C599B5E069EA1CADD5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698860105880
  • tweetId - 1719332283683864618
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Reuters article states that the Swiss Med Board does not need to approve the device as it is not a medical product. The co. making the product claims its internal legal review found the product is legal. The tweet appears to state "approval" b/c of this review. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-switzerland-pod-idUSL1N2SY1YR

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-01 17:35:05 UTC
(1698860105880)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-02 07:47:06 UTC
(1698911226426)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-01 17:06:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 13:26:44 -0500 Rating Details