Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-02 19:35:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EC3D08890C723A0EB1874184342FDD34EB28E99455446A1D1BFC0909288B5A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Gail Bradbrook has been convicted for criminal damage, not for protesting. The right to peaceful protest as defined in Article 11 of the Human Rights Act remains. Breaking a security window with tools is criminal damage, which is not a protected by the right to protest. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/AG-Ref-Colston-Four-judgment-280922.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1719748284351164648
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EC3D08890C723A0EB1874184342FDD34EB28E99455446A1D1BFC0909288B5A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1698953734711
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17197482843511646481EC3D08890C723A0EB1874184342FDD34EB28E99455446A1D1BFC0909288B5A5