Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-01 16:08:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Gail Bradbrook has been convicted for criminal damage, not for protesting. The right to peaceful protest as defined in Article 11 of the Human Rights Act remains. Breaking a security window with tools is criminal damage, which is not a protected by the right to protest. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/AG-Ref-Colston-Four-judgment-280922.pdf

Written by 5C1CE964C71839079833F594FC32A7F2E8AD284EAEE0630EAF048A16326BDA69
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719732183357604145

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1719748284351164648
  • noteId - 1719748284351164648
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5C1CE964C71839079833F594FC32A7F2E8AD284EAEE0630EAF048A16326BDA69 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698854917030
  • tweetId - 1719732183357604145
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Gail Bradbrook has been convicted for criminal damage, not for protesting. The right to peaceful protest as defined in Article 11 of the Human Rights Act remains. Breaking a security window with tools is criminal damage, which is not a protected by the right to protest. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/AG-Ref-Colston-Four-judgment-280922.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-01 16:08:37 UTC
(1698854917030)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-02 07:47:06 UTC
(1698911226426)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-03 10:55:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 03:52:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 15:36:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 15:17:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 15:07:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 14:35:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 10:38:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 04:38:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 19:12:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 16:57:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 13:52:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 12:38:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 12:34:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 12:01:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 11:26:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 11:25:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-24 06:45:02 -0600 Rating Details