Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 04:13:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D0B3BFA8726D972FBEA7E80DFD7E33A6534DE2247E60B894C7ECD68274E16F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The point of the post is that the same flub would have been more negative for Biden. Whether Trump corrected it is irrelevant. Biden is knocked on statements he corrects as well. Nonetheless, this is an opinion. We don’t know who would have been more negative for the same flub.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716983726054298033
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D0B3BFA8726D972FBEA7E80DFD7E33A6534DE2247E60B894C7ECD68274E16F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1698207198738
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17169837260542980333D0B3BFA8726D972FBEA7E80DFD7E33A6534DE2247E60B894C7ECD68274E16F1