Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-25 01:03:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The point of the post is that the same flub would have been more negative for Biden. Whether Trump corrected it is irrelevant. Biden is knocked on statements he corrects as well. Nonetheless, this is an opinion. We don’t know who would have been more negative for the same flub.

Written by 78BEC249B2F5F7AF59E5F20AC1181A212C13B70014F4C4D08F7D7B0BB41DFCD2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1716796507154710532

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1716983726054298033
  • noteId - 1716983726054298033
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 78BEC249B2F5F7AF59E5F20AC1181A212C13B70014F4C4D08F7D7B0BB41DFCD2 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698195794957
  • tweetId - 1716796507154710532
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • The point of the post is that the same flub would have been more negative for Biden. Whether Trump corrected it is irrelevant. Biden is knocked on statements he corrects as well. Nonetheless, this is an opinion. We don’t know who would have been more negative for the same flub.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-25 01:03:14 UTC
(1698195794957)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-26 05:05:11 UTC
(1698296711934)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-25 12:57:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 07:13:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 06:01:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 02:42:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-24 23:13:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-24 21:13:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 08:52:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 21:41:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 14:25:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 15:13:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 19:32:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 18:51:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 07:26:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 06:48:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 05:29:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 05:28:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 03:57:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 00:32:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-24 20:06:52 -0500 Rating Details