Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 23:52:04 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 92DD8769E7CC86BDA43655CFE59DC951700EF2EB2A9423DC7FA6B4EBC22EE2BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

RCTs conducted at the same period overall point towards no improved outcomes with HCQ. The added value of this study, using an observational approach, knowingly defective data, and a broken methodology is questionable. https://pubpeer.com/publications/08C7F120290F73A19DE04926217C58#1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715845842240786743
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 92DD8769E7CC86BDA43655CFE59DC951700EF2EB2A9423DC7FA6B4EBC22EE2BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1697932324737
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171584584224078674392DD8769E7CC86BDA43655CFE59DC951700EF2EB2A9423DC7FA6B4EBC22EE2BB