Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-21 21:41:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

RCTs conducted at the same period overall point towards no improved outcomes with HCQ. The added value of this study, using an observational approach, knowingly defective data, and a broken methodology is questionable. https://pubpeer.com/publications/08C7F120290F73A19DE04926217C58#1

Written by 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1715624769222017162

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1715845842240786743
  • noteId - 1715845842240786743
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697924502324
  • tweetId - 1715624769222017162
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • RCTs conducted at the same period overall point towards no improved outcomes with HCQ. The added value of this study, using an observational approach, knowingly defective data, and a broken methodology is questionable. https://pubpeer.com/publications/08C7F120290F73A19DE04926217C58#1

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-21 21:41:42 UTC
(1697924502324)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-22 04:35:12 UTC
(1697949312335)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-21 18:52:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 17:41:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 17:00:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 16:42:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 03:41:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 02:32:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 04:02:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-24 09:51:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 05:06:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 04:37:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 01:24:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 01:14:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 00:43:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 18:35:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 18:04:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 17:03:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 17:02:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 16:57:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 04:00:21 -0500 Rating Details