Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-17 14:37:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DAB9805BE791F72E3F4649465A4583EB87ADFFB4D3FEA182ACF41B2C1D9638ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article states that Community Notes "lacks transparency about how notes are approved", but the algorithm and data are 100% transparent and described here: 1) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes#matrix-factorization 2) https://github.com/twitter/communitynotes It also claims "how X approves contributors for the program"..."is unknown", which is also false: 1) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up 2) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/contributor-scores

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714724065846464646
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DAB9805BE791F72E3F4649465A4583EB87ADFFB4D3FEA182ACF41B2C1D9638ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1700231822423
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714724065846464646DAB9805BE791F72E3F4649465A4583EB87ADFFB4D3FEA182ACF41B2C1D9638ED