Birdwatch Note
2023-10-18 19:24:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The article states that Community Notes "lacks transparency about how notes are approved", but the algorithm and data are 100% transparent and described here: 1) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes#matrix-factorization 2) https://github.com/twitter/communitynotes It also claims "how X approves contributors for the program"..."is unknown", which is also false: 1) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up 2) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/contributor-scores
Written by A3286DE5369A8B9305ABD4E92CB8A6409EC4BF3B4182E82D6A641C4EE787C3E8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714424577772634344
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1714724065846464646
- noteId - 1714724065846464646
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A3286DE5369A8B9305ABD4E92CB8A6409EC4BF3B4182E82D6A641C4EE787C3E8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697657049986
- tweetId - 1714424577772634344
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article states that Community Notes "lacks transparency about how notes are approved", but the algorithm and data are 100% transparent and described here: 1) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes#matrix-factorization 2) https://github.com/twitter/communitynotes It also claims "how X approves contributors for the program"..."is unknown", which is also false: 1) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/signing-up 2) https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/contributor-scores
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-18 19:24:09 UTC (1697657049986) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-19 05:28:58 UTC (1697693338206) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-19 15:35:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-18 23:39:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-17 08:37:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-29 12:36:10 -0600 | Rating Details |