Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-17 17:07:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3482F33955540F0FDDCDD5068B3F886F3F4992D83B213800EE63ECD80A3EFA64
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not true. India's supreme court acknowledged the value and importance of same sex marriage and the work towards non-discrimination, but declared not being able to legalise it as that task is responsibility of the parliament and state legaslitures. https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20231017-india-s-top-court-says-it-does-not-have-the-power-to-legalise-same-sex-marriage https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/17/world/asia/india-same-sex-marriage.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714298171227078693
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3482F33955540F0FDDCDD5068B3F886F3F4992D83B213800EE63ECD80A3EFA64
  • createdAtMillis - 1697562424278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17142981712270786933482F33955540F0FDDCDD5068B3F886F3F4992D83B213800EE63ECD80A3EFA64