Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-17 15:11:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is not true. India's supreme court acknowledged the value and importance of same sex marriage and the work towards non-discrimination, but declared not being able to legalise it as that task is responsibility of the parliament and state legaslitures. https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20231017-india-s-top-court-says-it-does-not-have-the-power-to-legalise-same-sex-marriage https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/17/world/asia/india-same-sex-marriage.html

Written by 9CF15B090CAB99B8D0BFAF00C8C9D5A800C203A398001B7D221AA7D43F229DDF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714183922752598211

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1714298171227078693
  • noteId - 1714298171227078693
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9CF15B090CAB99B8D0BFAF00C8C9D5A800C203A398001B7D221AA7D43F229DDF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697555508798
  • tweetId - 1714183922752598211
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is not true. India's supreme court acknowledged the value and importance of same sex marriage and the work towards non-discrimination, but declared not being able to legalise it as that task is responsibility of the parliament and state legaslitures. https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20231017-india-s-top-court-says-it-does-not-have-the-power-to-legalise-same-sex-marriage https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/17/world/asia/india-same-sex-marriage.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-17 15:11:48 UTC
(1697555508798)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-18 02:53:36 UTC
(1697597616809)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-17 18:28:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 17:14:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 17:13:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 15:32:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 15:09:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 13:55:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 13:50:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 13:18:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 12:56:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 12:46:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 12:43:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 12:12:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 12:07:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 12:04:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 11:55:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 11:46:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 11:45:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 11:43:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 11:38:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 11:35:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 11:30:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 11:16:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 10:58:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 10:35:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 10:27:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 21:56:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 21:03:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 20:58:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 18:05:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 16:08:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 09:18:40 -0500 Rating Details