Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-16 13:03:39 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAAF6232C7E5417A76BD313D12678646DC2E13386E0747E0E3444C01D18020E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

I don’t believe they are living to 160 years old but to the CM quoting the ACS Journals, that is an article written by ATCC which is highly funded by pharmaceutical back organizations. We should find articles that back our position that clearly lack bias. https://www.atcc.org/about-us/who-we-are/our-partnerships

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1713877499728265361
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BAAF6232C7E5417A76BD313D12678646DC2E13386E0747E0E3444C01D18020E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1697461419439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1713877499728265361BAAF6232C7E5417A76BD313D12678646DC2E13386E0747E0E3444C01D18020E9