Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-16 11:20:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

I don’t believe they are living to 160 years old but to the CM quoting the ACS Journals, that is an article written by ATCC which is highly funded by pharmaceutical back organizations. We should find articles that back our position that clearly lack bias. https://www.atcc.org/about-us/who-we-are/our-partnerships

Written by E119C81A4441B8103910C9FDB1E50A757D64F67A898B173CA02D733FD3ED39D0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713615470241157603

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1713877499728265361
  • noteId - 1713877499728265361
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E119C81A4441B8103910C9FDB1E50A757D64F67A898B173CA02D733FD3ED39D0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697455212893
  • tweetId - 1713615470241157603
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • I don’t believe they are living to 160 years old but to the CM quoting the ACS Journals, that is an article written by ATCC which is highly funded by pharmaceutical back organizations. We should find articles that back our position that clearly lack bias. https://www.atcc.org/about-us/who-we-are/our-partnerships

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-16 11:20:12 UTC
(1697455212893)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-18 02:53:36 UTC
(1697597616809)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-16 09:21:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 08:03:39 -0500 Rating Details