Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-13 22:12:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF0AC834941C19A74D0059796D3BC868183DD43A5B565A9C4319E67C035A7238
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims stated are unverifiable since the study of interest has been retracted due to inconsistency in its conclusion section and the methodology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 Here is another breakdown of why the study was retracted. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NL9BK

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712930604965044365
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF0AC834941C19A74D0059796D3BC868183DD43A5B565A9C4319E67C035A7238
  • createdAtMillis - 1697235130946
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1712930604965044365BF0AC834941C19A74D0059796D3BC868183DD43A5B565A9C4319E67C035A7238