Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-13 20:37:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The claims stated are unverifiable since the study of interest has been retracted due to inconsistency in its conclusion section and the methodology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 Here is another breakdown of why the study was retracted. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NL9BK

Written by 171EB81ACD17DE65C0EFD2EDBC6869DF6EAAF61AFB2C11AD22B51CC071D2354E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712667619231252899

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712930604965044365
  • noteId - 1712930604965044365
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 171EB81ACD17DE65C0EFD2EDBC6869DF6EAAF61AFB2C11AD22B51CC071D2354E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697229455594
  • tweetId - 1712667619231252899
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The claims stated are unverifiable since the study of interest has been retracted due to inconsistency in its conclusion section and the methodology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 Here is another breakdown of why the study was retracted. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NL9BK

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-13 20:37:35 UTC
(1697229455594)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-14 02:31:47 UTC
(1697250707273)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-13 17:48:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 17:44:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 17:33:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 17:22:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 17:12:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 17:00:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 16:24:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 03:13:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 01:24:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 22:34:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 09:56:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-01-02 23:27:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-04 02:24:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-04 01:57:16 -0600 Rating Details