Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 08:24:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57559AB140D46964AB3D732DE37C014D2F508719A6AF92446503E6498849B779
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims stated are unverifiable since the study of interest has been retracted due to inconsistency in its conclusion section and the methodology. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 Here is another breakdown of why the study was retracted. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33NL9BK

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712930604965044365
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57559AB140D46964AB3D732DE37C014D2F508719A6AF92446503E6498849B779
  • createdAtMillis - 1707035081577
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171293060496504436557559AB140D46964AB3D732DE37C014D2F508719A6AF92446503E6498849B779