Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-14 23:13:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A207E0B5354371D203E1D893F3E3D596A152105FD4DDC01BB31FB8A442FC4C9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the Supreme Court ruled that the the legislation was “unconstitutional”, it did not “strike it down”. The ruling “simply invites the federal government to tighten up the act to ensure it doesn't step on provincial authority” https://beta.ctvnews.ca/local/calgary/2023/10/13/1_6600348.amp.html https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/cb/2023/40195-eng.aspx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712923327092904058
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A207E0B5354371D203E1D893F3E3D596A152105FD4DDC01BB31FB8A442FC4C9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1697325218997
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1712923327092904058A207E0B5354371D203E1D893F3E3D596A152105FD4DDC01BB31FB8A442FC4C9B