Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-13 20:08:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

While the Supreme Court ruled that the the legislation was “unconstitutional”, it did not “strike it down”. The ruling “simply invites the federal government to tighten up the act to ensure it doesn't step on provincial authority” https://beta.ctvnews.ca/local/calgary/2023/10/13/1_6600348.amp.html https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/cb/2023/40195-eng.aspx

Written by E6FA9C7E68076C8A4E2E4073B7943F0136B89E26A82462C20C7164B8EFF34999
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1712885226131935394

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712923327092904058
  • noteId - 1712923327092904058
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E6FA9C7E68076C8A4E2E4073B7943F0136B89E26A82462C20C7164B8EFF34999 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697227720413
  • tweetId - 1712885226131935394
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • While the Supreme Court ruled that the the legislation was “unconstitutional”, it did not “strike it down”. The ruling “simply invites the federal government to tighten up the act to ensure it doesn't step on provincial authority” https://beta.ctvnews.ca/local/calgary/2023/10/13/1_6600348.amp.html https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/cb/2023/40195-eng.aspx

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-13 20:08:40 UTC
(1697227720413)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-14 02:31:47 UTC
(1697250707273)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-13 20:00:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 18:59:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 18:10:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 17:46:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 17:32:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 17:22:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 16:06:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 15:29:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 18:47:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 18:13:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 12:14:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 11:54:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 07:51:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 06:46:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 06:39:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 00:33:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-14 00:05:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 23:49:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 22:19:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-13 22:12:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 08:59:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-20 15:02:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-12-07 21:51:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-07 19:33:12 -0600 Rating Details