Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 18:43:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2928B731E0D85F12E6A130C728F44AEF44B8846D5E21DD51A1938E5DDE7F8BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study mentioned is retrospective. Author's mention multiple limitations including "Retrospective studies are more prone to confounding than randomized controlled trials". https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297523000914 Multiple randomised trials have shown HCQ to have no effect as treatment against covid-19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34485970/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711834235999486167
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2928B731E0D85F12E6A130C728F44AEF44B8846D5E21DD51A1938E5DDE7F8BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1697049814159
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1711834235999486167C2928B731E0D85F12E6A130C728F44AEF44B8846D5E21DD51A1938E5DDE7F8BC