Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-10 20:01:00 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The study mentioned is retrospective. Author's mention multiple limitations including "Retrospective studies are more prone to confounding than randomized controlled trials". https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297523000914 Multiple randomised trials have shown HCQ to have no effect as treatment against covid-19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34485970/

Written by 306C6CF8917365FDEC354FA39009BEBB0B3D6440D7E7766D7C38CFB0C7C4E93E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711783556421165382

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1711834235999486167
  • noteId - 1711834235999486167
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 306C6CF8917365FDEC354FA39009BEBB0B3D6440D7E7766D7C38CFB0C7C4E93E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1696968060861
  • tweetId - 1711783556421165382
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The study mentioned is retrospective. Author's mention multiple limitations including "Retrospective studies are more prone to confounding than randomized controlled trials". https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297523000914 Multiple randomised trials have shown HCQ to have no effect as treatment against covid-19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34485970/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-10 20:01:00 UTC
(1696968060861)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-11 04:14:31 UTC
(1696997671017)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-10 19:30:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 16:08:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 16:06:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 15:51:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 15:09:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 15:07:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 15:47:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:43:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 13:18:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 09:20:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 08:03:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 07:04:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 06:34:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 06:20:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 04:52:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 03:28:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:49:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 02:07:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 01:24:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 23:34:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 23:13:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 22:32:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 22:06:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 21:36:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-10 20:17:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 01:34:27 -0500 Rating Details